ReST to Sage Worksheet
17 juin 2011 | Mise à jour: 08 septembre 2011 | Catégories: rst, sage | View CommentsDuring Sage Days 31, I worked on the ticket #11459 to implement rst to sws conversion. This post intends to give some documentation about this new feature. Here is an example of a ReStructuredText file calculus.rst:
******** Calculus ******** Let's do some calculus using Sage. Differentiation =============== The derivative of $\\sin(x)$ is:: sage: diff(sin(x), x) cos(x) The derivative of $\\log(x) + x^2$ is:: sage: diff(log(x) + x^2, x) 2*x + 1/x Integration =========== Sage can integrate $\\int x^3 dx$:: sage: f = x^3 sage: f.integral(x) 1/4*x^4 Let's compute $\\int x \\sin(x^2) dx$:: sage: f = x*sin(x^2) sage: integral(f,x) -1/2*cos(x^2)
Both the files calculus.rst and calculus.html, which was generated from the file calculus.rst using Docutils and the command rst2html.py calculus.rst calculus.html, can be uploaded into the Sage Notebook (copy their URL):
This will create a new worksheet:
I also implemented two command line scripts to generate the worksheet text file:
sage -rst2txt file.rst file.txt
and to generate the Sage worksheet (.sws) directly:
sage -rst2sws file.rst file.sws
I also added the possibility to automatically escape every backslashes if they are not already so that they don't get lost in the translation process. For more info, consult the documentation:
sage -rst2txt -h sage -rst2sws -h
ReST syntax highlighting for Sage docstrings in VIM
15 juin 2011 | Catégories: sage | View CommentsAuthor: | Franco Saliola |
---|---|
Contact: | saliola at gmail dot com |
Date: | 3 December 2010 |
Sage uses ReST syntax in its (Python) docstrings, but the default Python syntax highlighting in vim treats all docstrings as Python strings. Here is a method (by Franco Saliola) to enable ReST highlighting in the docstrings and highlighting of doctests.
Prerequisites
The usual syntax files python.vim and rst.vim must be in the ~/.vim/syntax folder. You can find those on the web. Here is the rst.vim file made by Nikolai Weibull (latest revision: 2010-01-23).
Configuration
Create the directory:
mkdir -p ~/.vim/after/syntax
Any file in this directory will be loaded after the default syntax files, allowing us modify the default highlighting and add our own customizations.
Copy the file python.vim (which can be found in the same directory as this file) into the directory ~/.vim/after/syntax.
The first few lines of the file python.vim define the default colours for the docstring text, the sage keywords and the sage prompt. You might want to modify these to suit your colour scheme.
References
- http://www.mail-archive.com/vim_use@googlegroups.com/msg06545.html
- help :syn-include
Evolution of the overall doctest coverage of Sage
06 mars 2011 | Catégories: sage | View CommentsI just did a graph of the Evolution of the Overall Doctest Coverage of Sage since 3 years. The png is below.
The coverage evolved quiet regularly during the last 20 releases (=20 months) with an average of a bit less than 5 percent a year. For sage-4.6.2, it is actually 84.8%. If we keep this rhythm, we should reach 90% coverage by March 2012 and 100% by April 2014.
The code I used is here : coverage_evolution.py.
Occurences of a certain factor in the Kolakoski word
16 février 2011 | Catégories: Kolakoski, sage | View CommentsThe factor 212212112112212112122112112212212112112212112122112112 occurs in the Kolakoski word at the positions 3190, 6366, 7614, 12950, 13765, 14277, 20385, 21344, 39674 and so on. The successive gaps of these first eight occurences are 3176, 1248, 5336, 815, 512, 6108, 959, 18330. Are the gap between all of these occurences bounded or not? The following table lists only the gap that are going increasingly for the Kolakoski word up to 100 billion (=10^9).
i | ith occurence | (i+1)th occurence | gap |
0 | 3190 | 6366 | 3176 |
2 | 7614 | 12950 | 5336 |
5 | 14277 | 20385 | 6108 |
7 | 21344 | 39674 | 18330 |
8 | 39674 | 58946 | 19272 |
17 | 85963 | 107018 | 21055 |
225 | 945732 | 966924 | 21192 |
685 | 2832810 | 2858670 | 25860 |
822 | 3549762 | 3583161 | 33399 |
965 | 4188934 | 4223349 | 34415 |
1526 | 6773992 | 6809208 | 35216 |
7117 | 31279355 | 31320896 | 41541 |
18054 | 79167173 | 79213333 | 46160 |
20838 | 90761663 | 90809563 | 47900 |
176198 | 768146935 | 768195609 | 48674 |
292643 | 1278852293 | 1278906094 | 53801 |
554207 | 2424441033 | 2424495471 | 54438 |
590128 | 2581311276 | 2581367730 | 56454 |
948506 | 4150204101 | 4150264753 | 60652 |
1156072 | 5055131250 | 5055199553 | 68303 |
1514374 | 6620302433 | 6620372047 | 69614 |
11154155 | 48788048239 | 48788121823 | 73584 |
The following image draws all the gaps in function of i for the first 10 million digit.
Writing object oriented code in Python
20 janvier 2011 | Catégories: sage | View CommentsI am currently at Sage Days 28. Right now, there is a discussion about Analytic combinatorics in Sage and the new code written by Alex Raichev at tikcet #10519 was mentionned in the discussion. His code is a bunch of def python functions in a sage file. In Sage, code is written in object oriented way.
I am not an expert of the domain of analytic combinatorics, but I am coding oriented object Python since some time now. So I wrote a comment on the ticket gathering my thoughts to, I hope, help Alex to rewrite his set of functions into an oriented object structure. I copied the content of my comment below as it will be easier to share it.
Writing object oriented code : Finding the objects
How to structure a bunch of functions into classes? How to find which objects (python classes) you need? Here is the trick I personaly use. Consider each of your functions as a question you ask. Then, ask yourself to who are you asking each of your questions? Answers often gives you a good hint about the objects you need to implement. EXAMPLE. Suppose I code the function determinant. Question : To who do I ask the determinant?. Answer: To a matrix. Hence, matrix might be a good object (a python class) to implement.
You are the best person to answer to these questions. You might have 30 functions in your file, but only two or three different answers to the above question. Regroup the similar functions together: they will become the methods of a same class.
The sage file you uploaded starts with:
r""" [...] This code relates to analytic combinatorics. More specifically, it is a collection of functions designed to compute asymptotics of Maclaurin coefficients of certain classes of multivariate generating functions. The main function asymptotics() returns the first `N` terms of the asymptotic expansion of the Maclaurin coefficients `F_{n\alpha}` of the multivariate meromorphic function `F=G/H` as `n\to\infty`. It assumes that `F` is holomorphic in a neighborhood of the origin, that `H` is a polynomial, and that asymptotics in the direction of `\alpha` (a tuple of positive integers) are controlled by smooth or multiple points. [...] """
Reading only these lines, I imagine the following structure:
class HolomorphicMultivariateMeromorphicFunction(object): # Constructor of the object def __init__(self, F, G): #stores important information on the object as attributes of self self._F = F self._G = G def maclaurin_coefficients(self, n, alpha): r""" Return the maclaurin coefficients of self. INPUT: - ``alpha`` - tuple of positive integers OUTPUT: a python list of the first terms OR maybe an object of a class you implement if there exists pertinent questions to ask to it. """ #Do some computations based (I guess) on self._F and self._G intermediate_result1 = self.some_intermediate_computations_1() #Do more computations return something def asymptotics(self, N, alpha): r""" Returns the asymptotics of Maclaurin coefficients. """ #Do some computations based (I guess) on self._F and self._G intermediate_result2 = self.some_intermediate_computations_2() intermediate_result3 = self.some_intermediate_computations_3() return something #put here all the others functions needed to compute the asymptotics def some_intermediate_computations_1(self): pass def some_intermediate_computations_2(self): pass def some_intermediate_computations_3(self): pass ...
It also looks like you need some robustness somehow. But I need to know more information about what means
"that asymptotics in the direction of \(\alpha\) (a tuple of positive integers) are controlled by smooth or multiple points."
to decide whether this is checked at the creation of the object or before returning the asymptotics. But these hypothesis should be checked somewhere.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Sébastien Labbé, Montréal, (but currently at Sage Days 28, Orsay, France)
« Previous Page -- Next Page »